Image-level Face Forgery Detection Methods: Revolutions, Challenges and Future Look
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/dwaesq34Keywords:
Deepfake detection, Spatial domain characters, Frequency characters, Diffusion model, Generalizability.Abstract
The rapid development of deep forgery technology poses a serious challenge to social information security. This paper systematically reviews the image-level face forgery detection methods, focusing on two technical routes: the spatial domain and the frequency domain. Spatial-domain methods achieve detection by analyzing pixel-level texture, color consistency, and boundary artifacts, supplemented by deep learning models; while frequency-domain methods use spectral features (e.g., high-frequency mesh traces) to reveal anomalies left behind by the generative model to detect the authenticity of an image. The study shows that the spatial-domain approach based on deep learning is easy to understand and has excellent detection accuracy, but lacks generalization; the frequency-domain approach is robust to compression perturbations, but is difficult to adapt to new generation techniques (e.g., diffusion models). In the future, people need to break the bottleneck of generalization, integrate multimodal features and explore lightweight design to improve the evaluation system of detection accuracy.
Downloads
References
[1] Matern F, Riess C, Stamminger M. Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations. Proceedings of 2019 IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops, 2019, Waikoloa, USA: IEEE: 83 - 92.
[2] Wang Gaojian, Jiang Qian, Jin Xin, Cui Xiaohui. FFR_FD: Effective and fast detection of DeepFakes via feature point defects. Information Sciences, 2022, 596: 472 - 488.
[3] Li Yuezun, Lyu Siwei. Exposing deepfake videos by detecting face warping artifacts. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2018: 46 - 52.
[4] Geng Pengzhi, Fan Hongxing, Zhang Yiyang, Tang Yunqi. Deepfake detection method based on tampering artifacts. Computer Engineering, 2021, 47 (12): 156 - 162.
[5] Amin M A, Hu Y, Guan Y, et al. Exploring varying color spaces through representative forgery learning to improve deepfake detection. Digital Signal Processing, 2024, 147: 104426.
[6] Jin X, Yu W, Chen D W, et al. DFD-NAS: General deepfake detection via efficient neural architecture search. Neurocomputing, 2025, 619: 129129.
[7] Chen Yonghao, Cai Manchun, Zhang Yiwen, et al. Face Forgery Detection Based on Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning and Dual-Stream Network [J]. Journal of Computer Engineering & Applications, 2025, 61 (10): 288 - 298.
[8] Uddin M, Fu Z, Zhang X, et al. Spatial and frequency feature fusion using multi-scale cross attention for enhancing deepfake face detection. Multimedia Systems, 2025, 31(4): 270 - 285.
[9] Yao Wenda, Li Panchi, Zhao Ya, Wu Hongchao. Review of research on face deepfake detection methods. Journal of Image and Graphics, 30 (7): 2343 - 2363.
[10] Dai Yunshu, Fai Jianwei, Xia Zhihua, Liu Jianan, Weng Jian. Local similarity anomaly for general face forgery detection. Journal of Image and Graphics. 2023, 28 (11): 3453 - 3470.
[11] Gao J, Xia Z, Marcialis G L, et al. DeepFake detection based on high-frequency enhancement network for highly compressed content. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 249: 123732.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







